z-logo
Premium
Quantitative characterization of virus‐like particles by asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation, electrospray differential mobility analysis, and transmission electron microscopy
Author(s) -
Pease Leonard F.,
Lipin Daniel I.,
Tsai DeHao,
Zachariah Michael R.,
Lua Linda H.L.,
Tarlov Michael J.,
Middelberg Anton P.J.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.22085
Subject(s) - dynamic light scattering , transmission electron microscopy , chemistry , dark field microscopy , characterization (materials science) , materials science , nanotechnology , biophysics , nanoparticle , microscopy , biology , physics , optics
Here we characterize virus‐like particles (VLPs) by three very distinct, orthogonal, and quantitative techniques: electrospray differential mobility analysis (ES‐DMA), asymmetric flow field‐flow fractionation with multi‐angle light scattering detection (AFFFF‐MALS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). VLPs are biomolecular particles assembled from viral proteins with applications ranging from synthetic vaccines to vectors for delivery of gene and drug therapies. VLPs may have polydispersed, multimodal size distributions, where the size distribution can be altered by subtle changes in the production process. These three techniques detect subtle size differences in VLPs derived from the non‐enveloped murine polyomavirus (MPV) following: (i) functionalization of the surface of VLPs with an influenza viral peptide fragment; (ii) packaging of foreign protein internally within the VLPs; and (iii) packaging of genomic DNA internally within the VLPs. These results demonstrate that ES‐DMA and AFFFF‐MALS are able to quantitatively determine VLP size distributions with greater rapidity and statistical significance than TEM, providing useful technologies for product development and process analytics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009; 102: 845–855. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here