z-logo
Premium
Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high‐solids concentrations
Author(s) -
Jørgensen Henning,
VibePedersen Jakob,
Larsen Jan,
Felby Claus
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.21115
Subject(s) - liquefaction , chemistry , environmental science , pulp and paper industry , organic chemistry , engineering
To improve process economics of the lignocellulose to ethanol process a reactor system for enzymatic liquefaction and saccharification at high‐solids concentrations was developed. The technology is based on free fall mixing employing a horizontally placed drum with a horizontal rotating shaft mounted with paddlers for mixing. Enzymatic liquefaction and saccharification of pretreated wheat straw was tested with up to 40% (w/w) initial DM. In less than 10 h, the structure of the material was changed from intact straw particles (length 1–5 cm) into a paste/liquid that could be pumped. Tests revealed no significant effect of mixing speed in the range 3.3–11.5 rpm on the glucose conversion after 24 h and ethanol yield after subsequent fermentation for 48 h. Low‐power inputs for mixing are therefore possible. Liquefaction and saccharification for 96 h using an enzyme loading of 7 FPU/g·DM and 40% DM resulted in a glucose concentration of 86 g/kg. Experiments conducted at 2%–40% (w/w) initial DM revealed that cellulose and hemicellulose conversion decreased almost linearly with increasing DM. Performing the experiments as simultaneous saccharification and fermentation also revealed a decrease in ethanol yield at increasing initial DM. Saccharomyces cerevisiae was capable of fermenting hydrolysates up to 40% DM. The highest ethanol concentration, 48 g/kg, was obtained using 35% (w/w) DM. Liquefaction of biomass with this reactor system unlocks the possibility of 10% (w/w) ethanol in the fermentation broth in future lignocellulose to ethanol plants. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007;96:862–870. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here