Premium
Reconsidering the use of photosynthetic bacteria for removal of sulfide from wastewater
Author(s) -
Hurse T.J.,
Keller J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.10816
Subject(s) - sulfide , photobioreactor , phototroph , oxidizing agent , sulfur , photosynthesis , chemistry , wastewater , environmental chemistry , biofilm , environmental science , chemical engineering , biomass (ecology) , bacteria , environmental engineering , ecology , geology , biology , organic chemistry , biochemistry , engineering , paleontology
The feasibility of using photosynthetic sulfide‐oxidizing bacteria to remove sulfide from wastewater in circumstances where axenic cultures are unrealistic has been completely reconsidered on the basis of known ecophysiological data, and the principles of photobioreactor and chemical reactor engineering. This has given rise to the development of two similar treatment concepts relying on biofilms dominated by green sulfur bacteria (GSB) that develop on the exterior of transparent surfaces suspended in the wastewater. The GSB are sustained and selected for by radiant energy in the band 720–780 nm, supplied from within the transparent surface. A model of one of these concepts was constructed and with it the reactor concept was proven. The dependence of sulfide‐removal rate on bulk sulfide concentration has been ascertained. The maximum net areal sulfide removal rate was 2.23 g m− 2 day− 1 at a bulk sulfide concentration of 16.5 mg L −1 and an incident irradiance of 1.51 W m −2 . The system has a demonstrated capacity to mitigate surges in sulfide load, and appears to use much less radiant power than comparable systems. The efficacy with which this energy was used for sulfide removal was 1.47 g day −1 W −1 . The biofilm was dominated by GSB, and evidence gathered indicated that other types of phototrophs were not present. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.