z-logo
Premium
Optimal temperature and photoperiod for the cultivation of Agardhiella subulata microplantlets in a bubble‐column photobioreactor
Author(s) -
Huang Yaoming,
Rorrer Gregory L.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.10307
Subject(s) - photobioreactor , photoperiodism , growth rate , biomass (ecology) , light intensity , zoology , diurnal cycle , saturation (graph theory) , darkness , light cycle , botany , biology , chemistry , atmospheric sciences , agronomy , optics , circadian rhythm , physics , geometry , mathematics , combinatorics , neuroscience
The optimal temperature and illumination photoperiod requirements for the phototrophic growth of a novel microplantlet suspension culture derived from the macrophytic marine red alga Agardhiella subulata were determined. The optimal growth temperature was 24°C. The effects of illumination light‐dark (LD) photoperiod (hour of light:hours of darkness within a 24 h cycle) on biomass production was studied within a bubble‐column photobioreactor. The 4.5 cm diameter photobioreactor was maintained at near‐saturation conditions with respect to light flux (38 μmol photons m −2 s −1 ), nutrient medium delivery (20% nutrient replacement per day), and CO 2 delivery (0.35 mmol CO 2 L −1 h −1 ) so that the cumulative effects of photodamage on the cell density versus time curve at photoperiods approaching continuous light could be observed. Biomass production was maximized at 16:8 LD, where biomass densities exceeding 3.6 g dry cell mass L −1 were achieved after 60 days in culture. Biomass production was proportional to photoperiod at low fractional photoperiods (≤10:14 LD), but high fractional photoperiods approaching continuous light (≥ 20:4 LD) shut down biomass production. Biomass production versus time profiles under resource‐saturated cultivation conditions were adequately described by a cumulative photodamage growth model, which coupled reversible photodamage processes to the specific growth rate. Under light‐saturated growth conditions, the rate constant for photodamage was k d = 1.17 ± 0.28 day −1 (±1.0 SE), and the rate constant for photodamage repair was k r = 5.12 ± 0.95 day −1 (±1.0 SE) at 24°C. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 79: 135–144, 2002.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom