Premium
Sensitivity analysis of a biofilm model describing a one‐stage completely autotrophic nitrogen removal (CANON) process
Author(s) -
Hao Xiaodi,
Heijnen Joseph J.,
van Loosdrecht Mark C. M.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.10105
Subject(s) - anammox , ammonium , chemistry , nitrogen , biofilm , effluent , nitrification , nitrite , autotroph , oxygen , bioreactor , environmental chemistry , pulp and paper industry , environmental engineering , chromatography , denitrification , nitrate , environmental science , organic chemistry , denitrifying bacteria , biology , bacteria , genetics , engineering
Abstract A mathematical model for nitrification and anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAMMOX) processes in a single biofilm reactor (CANON) was developed. This model describes completely autotrophic conversion of ammonium to dinitrogen gas. Aerobic ammonium and nitrite oxidation were modeled together with ANAMMOX. The sensitivity of kinetic constants and biofilm and process parameters to the process performance was evaluated, and the total effluent concentrations were, in general, found to be insensitive to affinity constants. Increasing the amount of biomass by either increasing biofilm thickness and density or decreasing porosity had no significant influence on the total effluent concentrations, provided that a minimum total biomass was present in the reactor. The ANAMMOX process always occurred in the depth of the biofilm provided that the oxygen concentration was limiting. The optimal dissolved oxygen concentration level at which the maximum nitrogen removal occurred is related to a certain ammonium surface load on the biofilm. An ammonium surface load of 2 g N/m 2 · d, associated with a dissolved oxygen concentration level of 1.3 g O 2 /m 3 in the bulk liquid and with a minimum biofilm depth of 1 mm seems a proper design condition for the one‐stage ammonium removal process. Under this condition, the ammonium removal efficiency is 94% (82% for the total nitrogen removal efficiency) (30°C). Better ammonium removal could be achieved with an increase in the dissolved oxygen concentration level, but this would strongly limit the ANAMMOX process and decrease total nitrogen removal. It can be concluded that a one‐stage process is probably not optimal if a good nitrogen effluent is required. A two‐stage process like the combined SHARON and ANAMMOX process would be advised for complete nitrogen removal. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 77: 266–277, 2002.