z-logo
Premium
Formation of several stable complexes between the minor components of the cyclic tetrapeptide cyclo‐(‐Pro 1 ‐Ala 2 ‐ D ‐Phe 3 ‐Leu 4 ‐) and some specific Boc‐amino acids
Author(s) -
McEwen I.,
Ottosson K.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
biopolymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.360330908
Subject(s) - tetrapeptide , chemistry , stereochemistry , isomerization , cyclic peptide , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , hydrogen bond , peptide , spectroscopy , amino acid , molecule , catalysis , organic chemistry , biochemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
The cyclic tetrapeptide cyclo(‐Pro 1 ‐Ala 2 ‐ D ‐Phe 3 ‐Leu 4 ‐) was modeled and synthesized to be used for molecular interactions and chiral discrimination studies in CDCl 3 . Total correlation spectroscopy and nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy spectra of the cyclic tetrapeptide showed the presence of one dominant stereoisomer— 1 —and three minor ones— 2a , 2b , and 2c —in a relationship of 92:6:1:1. They formed three‐ to five‐hydrogen bond complexes with Boc‐ D ‐Ser, Boc‐ L ‐Ser and Boc‐ L ‐Thr (Boc: t ‐butyloxylcarbonyl). These three Boc‐amino acids interact more strongly with 2a , 2b , and 2c than with 1 , altering their relative concentrations to 48:40:6:6. In the complex between the cyclic tetrapeptide and Boc‐ D ‐Ser, the stereoisomer 2a exchanged chemically with 1 , 2b , and 2c , while 1 did not exchange with either 2b or 2c . This chemical exchange is due to cis‐trans isomerization of the peptide bonds. The chiral discrimination of 2a , 2b , and 2c was stronger than that of 1 . No complexation occurred with Boc‐ L ‐Ala or Boc‐ L ‐Trp. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom