z-logo
Premium
Enthalpy and entropy changes for the intercalation of small molecules to DNA. II. Ethidium and propidium fluoride
Author(s) -
Hopkins Harry P.,
Wilson W. David
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
biopolymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.360260810
Subject(s) - chemistry , dication , enthalpy , intercalation (chemistry) , counterion , ion , inorganic chemistry , crystallography , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , physics
Enthalpy changes (Δ H B ) for the binding of ethidium (a monocation) and propidium (a dication) to calf thymus DNA have been determined calorimetrically in piperazine‐ N, N ′‐bis(2‐ethanesulfonic acid) buffer with the fluoride ion as the counterion. Heats of dilution for the fluoride salts of ethidium and propidium were substantially less than the corresponding values found for other halide salts of these cations. At a Na + ion concentrations of 0.019, Δ H B = −8.3 and −7.9 ± 0.3 kcal mol −1 for ethidium and propidium, respectively. For these two cations, just as was observed for the naphthalene monoimide (monocation) and diimide (dication) [H. P. Hopkins, K. A. Stevenson, and W. D. Wilson, (1986) J. Sol. Chem. 15 , 563–579], Δ H B is within the same experimental error for both cations. Apparently, charge–charge interactions in DNA–cation complexes produce only small changes in the enthalpy for the system. In the concentration range 0.019–0.207, the Δ H B values for propidium did not depend appreciably on the Na + ion concentration, and a similar pattern was shown to exist for ethidium. When these results were combined with Δ G B values for the binding of these cations to DNA, we found the variation of Δ S B with Na + ion concentration to be remarkably close to the predictions of modern polyelectrolyte theory, i.e., propidium binding to DNA causes approximately twice as many Na + ions to be released into the bulk solution as does the binding of ethidium. The much stronger binding of propidium, relative to ethidium, at low ionic strengths is thus seen to be primarily due to entropic effects.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here