z-logo
Premium
Stabilization of short helices by intramolecular cluster formation
Author(s) -
Mattice Wayne L.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
biopolymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.360241206
Subject(s) - intramolecular force , chemistry , antiparallel (mathematics) , helix (gastropod) , statistical weight , crystallography , partition function (quantum field theory) , alpha helix , stereochemistry , physics , circular dichroism , thermodynamics , ecology , quantum mechanics , snail , magnetic field , biology
The intramolecular formation of multiple clusters of interacting helices has been characterized in a homopolymer. The configuration partition function permits the formation of clusters in which the number of interacting helices may be as large as the greatest integer in n /2, where n denotes the number of amino acid residues in the chain. The theoretical formulation has its origin in a recent [Mattice, W. L. & Scheraga, H. A. (1984) Biopolymers 23 , 1701–1724], tractable matrix expression for the configuration partition function for intramolecular antiparallel β‐sheet formation. Reassignment of the expression for one of the n ( n +3)/2 elements in the sparse statistical weight matrix, along with a simple change in notation, converts that treatment into a matrix formulation of the configuration partition function for a chain containing multiple clusters of interacting antiparallel helices. The five statistical weights used are δ, f l , w , and the Zimm‐Bragg σ and s . Each tight bend that connects two interacting helices contributes a factor of δ, f l is used in the weight for larger loops between interacting helices, and w arises from helix–helix interaction. The influence of the helix–helix interaction is well illustrated by two helix–coil transitions in a chain with n = 156 and σ = 0.001. In the absence of helix–helix interaction, the transition occurs by the nucleation and subsequent elongation of a small number of helices. When helix–helix interaction is attractive, the transition can occur by a different mechanism. Formation of a single pair of interacting helices is followed by addition of new helices to the initial cluster. In the latter process, individual helices experience relatively little growth after they are formed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here