Premium
Hyaluronate diffusion in semidilute solutions
Author(s) -
Wik K.O.,
Comper W. D.
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
biopolymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.360210308
Subject(s) - chemistry , diffusion , einstein relation , thermodynamics , relaxation (psychology) , concentration gradient , molecular diffusion , analytical chemistry (journal) , chromatography , physics , psychology , social psychology , metric (unit) , operations management , economics
Analysis of the mutual diffusion coefficient of hyaluronate reveals that it rapidly increases with increasing concentration or decreasing ionic strength. The mutual diffusion coefficients analyzed by boundary relaxation in the analytical ultracentrifuge by either Raleigh interference optics or absorption optics (through the use of fluorescein‐labeled hyaluronate) yielded similar values. The theoretical treatment of the mutual diffusion coefficient has been analyzed in terms of experimentally measured intradiffusion coefficients and thermodynamic virial coefficients. Only approximate agreement between theory and experiment was found. The concept of formation of transient statistical network structures in semidilute solutions of hyaluronate was applied to evaluate a critical concentration at which network formation occurs. This has been discussed in relation to the marked decrease in the intradiffusion coefficient of hyaluronate with concentration. The formation of network structures in hyaluronate was found not to preclude the hyaluronate undergoing extremely rapid rates of mutual diffusion (with diffusion coefficients ∼30 × 10 −11 m 2 s 1 ) under conditions of relatively large initial chemical potential gradients. Measurements of the unidirectional flux of hyaluronate for nonzero gradients demonstrated their marked sensitivity to the magnitude of the concentration difference across the boundary. An experimental feature of the unidrectional diffusion coefficients of hyaluronate is that they may be analyzed purely in terms of mutual and intradiffusion processes. The backflux diffusion coefficient (describing the flux against the imposed concentration gradient) appeared identical with the intradiffusion coefficient. The analysis of the various sources of errors made in this study suggests that the magnitude of the diffusion coefficients measured may be regarded only as approximate.