z-logo
Premium
Effects of ring contraction on the conformational preferences of α‐substituted proline analogs
Author(s) -
RevillaLópez Guillem,
Warren Javier G.,
Torras Juan,
Jiménez Ana I.,
Cativiela Carlos,
Alemán Carlos
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
peptide science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.21716
Subject(s) - pyrrolidine , chemistry , steric effects , azetidine , proline , stereochemistry , contraction (grammar) , ring (chemistry) , amino acid , organic chemistry , medicine , biochemistry
The structural consequences derived from the incorporation of either a methyl or a phenyl group at the α carbon of proline were recently investigated by quantum mechanical calculations (J Org Chem 2008, 73, 3418). In this work, the effect produced by contraction of the pyrrolidine ring on such α‐substituted proline analogs has been explored using the same computational methods. Specifically, the intrinsic conformational preferences of the N ‐acetyl‐ N′ ‐methylamide derivatives of the lower proline homolog L ‐azetidine‐2‐carboxylic acid (Aze), characterized by a four‐ instead of a five‐membered ring, and its α‐methyl (αMeAze) and α‐phenyl (αPhAze) derivatives have been determined using quantum mechanical calculations and compared to those observed before for the proline counterparts. Replacement of the pyrrolidine ring by an azetidine cycle leads to a reduction of the conformational flexibility, especially for the Aze and αMeAze derivatives, which should be attributed to the quasi‐planar geometry of the four‐membered ring. Furthermore, the azetidine nitrogen shows pyramidalization, which depending on the peptide backbone conformation favors the formation of an attractive N–H···N interaction or alleviates a severe steric hindrance. Calculations on different environments predict that the tendency of αMeAze to adopt γ‐turns is higher than that of unsubstituted Aze and α‐methylproline, this feature being in full agreement with the experimental observations available. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 98: 98–110, 2012.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here