z-logo
Premium
Conformational preferences and cis–trans isomerization of L ‐3,4‐dehydroproline residue
Author(s) -
Kang Young Kee,
Park Hae Sook
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
peptide science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.21203
Subject(s) - chemistry , isomerization , dipeptide , hydrogen bond , intramolecular force , stereochemistry , peptide bond , polyproline helix , crystallography , peptide , ring (chemistry) , molecule , catalysis , organic chemistry , biochemistry
The conformational study of N ‐acetyl‐ N ′‐methylamide of L ‐3,4‐dehydroproline (Ac‐Dhp‐NHMe, the Dhp dipeptide) is carried out using hybrid density functional methods with the self‐consistent reaction field method in the gas phase and in solution (chloroform and water). The incorporation of a double bond between C β and C γ into the prolyl ring results in the puckering, backbone population, and barriers to prolyl cis – trans isomerization different from those of the Pro dipeptide. For local minima of the Dhp dipeptide in the gas phase and in water, the C β C γ bonds become shorter by ∼0.2 Å and the bond angles C α C β C γ and C β C γ C δ are widened by ∼8° than those of the Pro dipeptide, and the puckering amplitude is computed to be 0.01–0.07 Å, indicating that the 3,4‐dehydroprolyl ring is quite less puckered. However, polyproline‐like conformations become preferred and the relative stability of the conformation tC with a C 7 intramolecular hydrogen bond decreases as the solvent polarity increases, as found for the Pro dipeptide. The barriers to cis – trans isomerization of the Ac−Dhp peptide bond increase with the increase of solvent polarity and the isomerization is likely to proceed through the clockwise rotation in water, as found for the prolyl peptide bond. The hydrogen bond between the prolyl nitrogen and the following amide NH group seems to contribute in stabilizing the transition state structures. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 92: 387–398, 2009. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here