Premium
Exploring the interactions of gliadins with model membranes: Effect of confined geometry and interfaces
Author(s) -
Banc Amélie,
Desbat Bernard,
Renard Denis,
Popineau Yves,
Mangavel Cécile,
Navailles Laurence
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
biopolymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.21188
Subject(s) - chemistry , monolayer , membrane , crystallography , lamellar structure , context (archaeology) , biophysics , phospholipid , chemical physics , analytical chemistry (journal) , biochemistry , chromatography , paleontology , biology
Mechanisms leading to the assembly of wheat storage proteins into proteins bodies within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of endosperm cells are unresolved today. In this work, physical chemistry parameters which could be involved in these processes were explored. To model the confined environment of proteins within the ER, the dynamic behavior of γ‐gliadins inserted inside lyotropic lamellar phases was studied using FRAP experiments. The evolution of the diffusion coefficient as a function of the lamellar periodicity enabled to propose the hypothesis of an interaction between γ‐gliadins and membranes. This interaction was further studied with the help of phospholipid Langmuir monolayers. γ‐ and ω‐gliadins were injected under DMPC and DMPG monolayers and the two‐dimensional (2D) systems were studied by Brewster angle microscopy (BAM), polarization modulation infrared reflection‐absorption spectroscopy (PM‐IRRAS), and surface tension measurements. Results showed that both gliadins adsorbed under phospholipid monolayers, considered as biological membrane models, and formed micrometer‐sized domains at equilibrium. However, their thicknesses, probed by reflectance measurements, were different: ω‐gliadins aggregates displayed a constant thickness, consistent with a monolayer, while the thickness of γ‐gliadins aggregates increased with the quantity of protein injected. These different behaviors could find some explanations in the difference of aminoacid sequence distribution: an alternate repeated ‐ unrepeated domain within γ‐gliadin sequence, while one unique repeated domain was present within ω‐gliadin sequence. All these findings enabled to propose a model of gliadins self‐assembly via a membrane interface and to highlight the predominant role of wheat prolamin repeated domain in the membrane interaction. In the biological context, these results would mean that the repeated domain could be considered as an anchor for the interaction with the ER membrane and a nucleus point for the formation and growth of protein bodies within endosperm cells. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 91: 610–622, 2009. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com