z-logo
Premium
M. Taq I facilitates the base flipping via an unusual DNA backbone conformation
Author(s) -
Wibowo Fajar R.,
Rauch Christine,
Trieb Michael,
Liedl Klaus R.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
biopolymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.20341
Subject(s) - chemistry , thymine , phosphodiester bond , dna , crystallography , base pair , stereochemistry , tetrad , thermus aquaticus , dna methyltransferase , methyltransferase , methylation , rna , biochemistry , botany , biology , gene , polymerase
MD simulations have been carried out to understand the dynamical behavior of the DNA substrate of the Thermus aquaticus DNA methyltransferase (M. Taq I) in the methylation process at N6 of adenine. As starting structures, an x‐ray structure of M. Taq I in complex with DNA and cofactor analogue (PDB code: 1G38) and free decamer d (GTTCGATGTC) 2 were taken. The x‐ray structure shows two consecutive BII substates that are not observed in the free decamer. These consecutive BII substates are also observed during our simulation. Additionally, their facing backbones adopt the same conformations. These double facing BII substates are stable during the last 9 ns of the trajectories and result in a stretched DNA structure. On the other hand, protein–DNA contacts on 5′ and 3′ phosphodiester groups of the partner thymine of flipped adenine have changed. The sugar and phosphate parts of thymine have moved further into the empty space left by the flipping base without the influence of protein. Furthermore, readily high populated BII substates at the GpA step of palindromic tetrad TCGA rather than CpG step are observed in the free decamer. On the contrary, the BI substate at the GpA step is observed on the flipped adenine strand. A restrained MD simulation, reproducing the BI/BII pattern in the complex, demonstrated the influence of the unusual backbone conformation on the dynamical behavior of the target base. This finding along with the increased nearby interstrand phosphate distance is supportive to the N6‐methylation mechanism. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 79: 128–138, 2005 This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here