z-logo
Premium
Studies of the receptor‐bound conformation of α IIb β 3 antagonists by 15 N‐edited NMR spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Locardi Elsa,
Mattern RalphHeiko,
Malaney Timothy I.,
Minasyan Robert,
Pierschbacher Michael D.,
Taulane Joseph P.,
Goodman Murray
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
peptide science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.10999
Subject(s) - chemistry , pharmacophore , stereochemistry , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , antagonist , peptide , receptor , crystallography , biochemistry
We report the results of NMR studies and computer simulations of potent antagonists reflective of the α IIb β 3 receptor‐bound conformations. The peptides c[Mpa– 15 N‐Arg 1 – 15 N‐Gly 2 – 15 N‐Asp 3 – 15 N‐Phe 4 – 15 N‐Arg 5 –Cys]‐NH 2 ( Phe–Arg analog) (Mpa: 3‐mercaptopropionic acid) and c[Mpa– 15 N‐Arg 1 – 15 N‐Gly 2 – 15 N‐Asp 3 – 15 N‐Asp 4 – 15 N‐Val 5 –Cys]‐NH 2 ( Asp – Val analog) were subjected to 15 N‐edited NMR experiments to study the conformations of these peptides in the absence and in the presence of α IIb β 3 receptor. The NMR studies of the Phe – Arg analog, a selective α IIb β 3 antagonist, resulted in distinctly different experimental data in the presence and absence of the receptor. The computer simulations for this peptide resulted in one large family of structures consistent with the experimental data. This conformation suggests a type I β‐turn spanning residues Arg 1 and Gly 2 when bound to the receptor and we were able to establish a model for the three dimensional arrangement of the pharmacophores. The studies on the Asp – Val analog, an α v β 3 antagonist that binds to the α IIb β 3 with moderate affinity, resulted in conformations that are not as well defined as those for the Phe – Arg analog but are consistent with the model established for this analog. These results are important for the design of novel α IIb β 3 antagonists. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 66: 326–338, 2002

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here