z-logo
Premium
Structure–activity relationships of dynorphin analogs substituted in positions 2 and 3
Author(s) -
Schlechtingen Georg,
DeHaven Robert N.,
Daubert Jeffrey D.,
Cassel Joel,
Goodman Murray
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
peptide science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/bip.10382
Subject(s) - chemistry , radioligand , agonist , selectivity , stereochemistry , dynorphin , dynorphin a , affinities , piperidine , receptor , opioid peptide , opioid , biochemistry , catalysis
Following up on the observation that the dynorphin analog [Pro 3 ]Dyn A(1–11)–NH 2 2 possesses high affinity and selectivity for the κ opioid receptor, a number of related peptides were prepared and characterized by radioligand binding and [ 35 S]GTPγS assays. While incorporation of 2‐azetidine carboxylic acid in position 3 led to the equally potent analog 3 , the corresponding analog containing piperidine‐2‐carboxylic acid showed a nearly 90‐fold reduction in κ affinity. Differential preferred bond angles ϕ in the three building blocks might account for these observations. Compounds 2 and 3 were κ antagonists with IC 50 values of 380 and 350 nM, respectively. The Sar 3 analog 7 and the Sar 2 analog 8 were κ agonists, with greater selectivity than Dyn A(1–11)–NH 2 1 . In view of their high κ affinities ( 8 : K i = 1.5 n M ; 2 : K i = 2.4 n M ), the new analogs were surprisingly weak κ agonists or antagonists, e.g., the EC 50 value for the agonist 8 was 280 n M . Different κ receptor subtypes in binding vs functional assays can not account for these results, since both assays were performed using the same membrane preparation. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 71: 71–76, 2003

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here