Premium
Histidine affinity tags affect MSP1 42 structural stability and immunodominance in mice
Author(s) -
Khan Farhat,
Legler Patricia M.,
Mease Ryan M.,
Duncan Elizabeth H.,
BergmannLeitner Elke S.,
Angov Evelina
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
biotechnology journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.144
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1860-7314
pISSN - 1860-6768
DOI - 10.1002/biot.201100331
Subject(s) - affect (linguistics) , histidine , immunodominance , biology , chemistry , biochemistry , psychology , communication , amino acid , cytotoxic t cell , in vitro
Inclusion of affinity tags has greatly facilitated process development for protein antigens, primarily for their recovery from complex mixtures. Although generally viewed as supportive of product development, affinity tags may have unintended consequences on protein solubility, susceptibility to aggregation, and immunogenicity. Merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1), an erythrocytic stage protein of Plasmodium falciparum and a candidate malaria vaccine, was used to evaluate the impact of a metal ion affinity‐tag on both protein structure and the induction of immunity. To this end, codon harmonized gene sequences from the P. falciparum MSP1 42 of FVO and 3D7 parasites were cloned and purified with and without a histidine (His) tag. We report on the influence of His‐affinity tags on protein expression levels, solubility, secondary structure, thermal denaturation, aggregation and the impact on humoral and cellular immune responses in mice. While the overall immunogenicity induced by His‐tagged MSP1 42 proteins is greater, the fine specificity of the humoral and cellular immune responses is altered relative to anti‐parasitic antibody activity and the breadth of T‐cell responses. Thus, the usefulness of protein tags may be outweighed by their potential impact on structure and function, stressing the need for caution in their use. See accompanying commentary by Randolph DOI: 10.1002/biot.201100459