z-logo
Premium
Electrogenerated chemiluminescence of tris(2‐phenylpyridine)iridium(III) in water, acetonitrile and trifluorethanol
Author(s) -
Robinson Wesley D.,
Richter Mark M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
luminescence
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1522-7243
pISSN - 1522-7235
DOI - 10.1002/bio.2691
Subject(s) - aqueous solution , acetonitrile , chemistry , chemiluminescence , iridium , electrochemiluminescence , electrochemistry , excited state , photoluminescence , luminescence , photochemistry , analytical chemistry (journal) , inorganic chemistry , materials science , electrode , catalysis , chromatography , organic chemistry , optoelectronics , physics , nuclear physics
The spectroscopic, electrochemical and coreactant electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) properties of Ir(ppy)3 (where ppy = 2‐phenylpyridine) have been obtained in aqueous buffered (KH2PO4), 50 : 50 (v/v) acetonitrile–aqueous buffered (MeCN–KH2PO4) and 30% trifluoroethanol (TFE) solutions. Tri‐n‐propylamine was used as the oxidative‐reductive ECL coreactant. The photoluminescence (PL) efficiency (ϕem) of Ir(ppy)3 in TFE (ϕem ≈ 0.029) was slightly higher than in 50 : 50 MeCN–KH2PO4 (ϕem ≈ 0.0021) and water (ϕem ≈ 0.00016) compared to a Ru(bpy)32+ standard solution in water (Φem ≈ 0.042). PL and ECL emission spectra were nearly identical in all three solvents, with dual emission maxima at 510 and 530 nm. The similarity between the ECL and PL spectra indicate that the same excited state is probably formed in both experiments. ECL efficiencies (ϕecl) in 30% TFE solution (ϕecl = 0.0098) were higher than aqueous solution (ϕecl = 0.00092) system yet lower than a 50% MeCN–KH2PO4 solution (ϕecl = 0.0091). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here