z-logo
Premium
A Two‐stage Design for Comparing Clinical Trials
Author(s) -
Chen Pinyuen,
Hsu Lifang
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
biometrical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.108
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1521-4036
pISSN - 0323-3847
DOI - 10.1002/bimj.4710340104
Subject(s) - stage (stratigraphy) , sample size determination , statistics , mathematics , selection (genetic algorithm) , set (abstract data type) , population , optimal design , computer science , medicine , artificial intelligence , paleontology , environmental health , biology , programming language
A two‐stage design is proposed to choose among several experimental treatments and a standard treatment in clinical trials. The first stage employs a selection procedure to select the best treatment, provided it is better than the standard. The second stage tests the hypothesis between the best treatment selected at the first stage (if any) and the standard treatment. All the treatments are assumed to follow normal distributions and the best treatment is the one with the largest population mean. The level and the power are defined and they are used to set up equations to solve unknown first stage sample size, second stage sample size, and procedure parameters. The optimal design is the one that gives the smallest average sample size. Numerical results are presented to illustrate the improvement of one design as compared to existing one stage design.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here