z-logo
Premium
Modeling physical activity data using L 0 ‐penalized expectile regression
Author(s) -
Wirsik Norman,
OttoSobotka Fabian,
Pigeot Iris
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
biometrical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.108
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1521-4036
pISSN - 0323-3847
DOI - 10.1002/bimj.201800007
Subject(s) - hidden markov model , accelerometer , cut point , regression , statistics , regression analysis , mathematics , range (aeronautics) , markov chain , computer science , variable (mathematics) , artificial intelligence , engineering , aerospace engineering , operating system , mathematical analysis
In recent years accelerometers have become widely used to objectively assess physical activity. Usually intensity ranges are assigned to the measured accelerometer counts by simple cut points, disregarding the underlying activity pattern. Under the assumption that physical activity can be seen as distinct sequence of distinguishable activities, the use of hidden Markov models (HMM) has been proposed to improve the modeling of accelerometer data. As further improvement we propose to use expectile regression utilizing a Whittaker smoother with an L 0 ‐penalty to better capture the intensity levels underlying the observed counts. Different expectile asymmetries beyond the mean allow the distinction of monotonous and more variable activities as expectiles effectively model the complete distribution of the counts. This new approach is investigated in a simulation study, where we simulated 1,000 days of accelerometer data with 1 and 5 s epochs, based on collected labeled data to resemble real‐life data as closely as possible. The expectile regression is compared to HMMs and the commonly used cut point method with regard to misclassification rate, number of identified bouts and identified levels as well as the proportion of the estimate being in the range of ± 10 % of the true activity level. In summary, expectile regression utilizing a Whittaker smoother with an L 0 ‐penalty outperforms HMMs and the cut point method and is hence a promising approach to model accelerometer data.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here