z-logo
Premium
The Anti‐G0 Manifesto: Should a problematic construct (G0) with no biological reality be removed from the cell cycle? Yes!
Author(s) -
Cooper Stephen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
bioessays
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.175
H-Index - 184
eISSN - 1521-1878
pISSN - 0265-9247
DOI - 10.1002/bies.202000270
Subject(s) - manifesto , construct (python library) , reality check , phase (matter) , cell cycle , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , cell , chemistry , computer science , political science , biochemistry , botany , test (biology) , organic chemistry , law , programming language
It is widely accepted that there exists a “resting” or “quiescent” state where a growing cell leaves the cell cycle to enter what is often called the “G0‐phase.” I propose that there is no biological reality to the “G0‐phase.” The experimental basis for proposing a G0‐phase is re‐examined and re‐analyzed here showing that the G0‐phase is an anthropomorphic construct with no biological reality.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here