Premium
Decoding the phonics screening check
Author(s) -
Darnell Catherine A.,
Solity Jonathan E.,
Wall Helen
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
british educational research journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.171
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1469-3518
pISSN - 0141-1926
DOI - 10.1002/berj.3269
Subject(s) - phonics , pronunciation , reading (process) , vocabulary , psychology , computer science , linguistics , decoding methods , active listening , mathematics education , primary education , communication , philosophy , telecommunications
The statutory ‘phonics screening check’ was introduced in 2012 and reflects the current emphasis in England on teaching early reading through systematic synthetic phonics. The check is intended to assess children's phonic abilities and their knowledge of 85 grapheme–phoneme correspondences ( GPC s) through decoding 20 real words and 20 pseudo words. Since the national rollout, little attention has been devoted to the content of the checks. The current paper, therefore, reviews the first three years of the check between 2012 and 2014 to examine how the 85 specified GPC s have been assessed and whether children are only using decoding skills to read the words. The analysis found that out of the 85 GPC s considered testable by the check, just 15 GPC s accounted for 67% of all GPC occurrences, with 27 of the 85 specified GPC s (31.8%) not appearing at all. Where a grapheme represented more than one phoneme, the most frequently occurring pronunciation was assessed in 72.2% of cases, with vocabulary knowledge being required to determine the correct pronunciation within real words where multiple pronunciations were possible. The GPC s assessed, therefore, do not reflect the full range of GPC s that it is expected will be taught within a systematic synthetic phonics approach. Furthermore, children's ability to decode real words is dependent on their vocabulary knowledge, not just their phonic skills. These results question the purpose and validity of the phonics screening check and the role of synthetic phonics for teaching early reading.