Premium
Nonhuman primates will not respond to turn off strong 60 Hz electric fields
Author(s) -
Rogers Walter R.,
Orr John L.,
Smith Houston D.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
bioelectromagnetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.435
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1521-186X
pISSN - 0197-8462
DOI - 10.1002/bem.2250160706
Subject(s) - reinforcement , stimulus (psychology) , aversive stimulus , psychology , extinction (optical mineralogy) , conditioning , audiology , affect (linguistics) , neuroscience , developmental psychology , cognitive psychology , physics , communication , social psychology , medicine , optics , mathematics , statistics
Using a set of six baboons ( Papio cynocephalus ), we conducted a series of seven experiments designed to evaluate the potentially aversive character of a 60 Hz electric field (EF). Initially, the subjects were trained, using food rewards as the reinforcer, to respond only when a cue light was illuminated. Next, an EF was presented along with the cue light; responses produced delivery of a food pellet and turned off both the cue light and the EF. Then, stimulus and reward conditions were varied. We determined that (1) presence of a strong EF does not affect operant responding for food rewards, (2) subjects will not respond at normal rates when the only reinforcer is termination of a strong EF, (3) presence of a strong EF can serve as a discriminative stimulus, (4) presence of a strong EF does not affect extinction of an appetite‐motivated task, and (5) presentation of an EF can become a secondary reinforcer. The pattern of results was consistent across all experiments, suggesting that an EF of as much 65 kV/m is not aversive to nonhuman primates. Separately, we demonstrated that the average EF detection threshold for baboons is 12 kV/m. Thus, EF exposure at intensities well above the detection threshold and at species‐scaled EF strengths greater than those found environmentally does not appear to be aversive. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.