Premium
Compliance boundaries for multiple‐frequency base station antennas in three directions
Author(s) -
Thielens Arno,
Vermeeren Günter,
Kurup Divya,
Joseph Wout,
Martens Luc
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
bioelectromagnetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.435
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1521-186X
pISSN - 0197-8462
DOI - 10.1002/bem.21778
Subject(s) - specific absorption rate , bioelectromagnetics , antenna (radio) , compliance (psychology) , acoustics , mathematics , electrical engineering , engineering , physics , electromagnetic field , psychology , social psychology , quantum mechanics
Abstract In this article, compliance boundaries and allowed output powers are determined for the front, back, and side of multiple‐frequency base station antennas, based on the root‐mean‐squared electric field, the whole‐body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR), and the 10 g averaged SAR in both the limbs and the head and trunk. For this purpose, the basic restrictions and reference levels defined by the International Commission on Non‐Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) for both the general public and occupational exposure are used. The antennas are designed for Global System for Mobile Communications around 900 MHz (GSM900), GSM1800, High Speed Packet Access (HSPA), and Long Term Evolution (LTE), and are operated with output powers at the individual frequencies up to 300 W. The compliance boundaries are estimated using finite‐difference time‐domain simulations with the Virtual Family Male and have been determined for three directions with respect to the antennas for 800, 900, 1800, and 2600 MHz. The reference levels are not always conservative when the radiating part of the antenna is small compared to the length of the body. Combined compliance distances, which ensure compliance with all reference levels and basic restrictions, have also been determined for each frequency. A method to determine a conservative estimation of compliance boundaries for multiple‐frequency (cumulative) exposure is introduced. Using the errors on the estimated allowed powers, an uncertainty analysis is carried out for the compliance distances. Uncertainties on the compliance distances are found to be smaller than 122%. Bioelectromagnetics. 34:465–478. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.