Premium
Specific absorption rate and electric field measurements in the near field of six mobile phone base station antennas
Author(s) -
Toivonen Tommi,
Toivo Tim,
Puranen Lauri,
Jokela Kari
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
bioelectromagnetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.435
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1521-186X
pISSN - 0197-8462
DOI - 10.1002/bem.20478
Subject(s) - specific absorption rate , mobile phone , base station , electric field , absorption (acoustics) , electrical engineering , telecommunications , field (mathematics) , bioelectromagnetics , electromagnetic field , environmental science , acoustics , physics , optics , computer science , engineering , antenna (radio) , mathematics , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics
In this article, the exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields was studied in close proximity (distances of 10, 100, 300, and 600 mm) to six base station antennas. The specific absorption rate (SAR) in 800 mm × 500 mm × 200 mm box phantom as well as unperturbed electric field ( E ) in air was measured. The results were used to determine whether the measurement of local maximum of unperturbed electric field can be used as a compliance check for local exposure. Also, the conservativeness of this assessment method compared to the ICNIRP basic restriction was studied. Moreover, the assessment of whole‐body exposure was discussed and the distance ranges presented in which the ICNIRP limit for local exposure could be exceeded before the limit for whole‐body SAR. These results show that the electric field measurement alone can be used for easy compliance check for the local exposure at all distances and for all antenna types studied. However, in some cases when the local peak value of E was compared directly to the ICNIRP reference level for unperturbed E , the exposure was overestimated only very slightly (by factor 1.1) compared to the basic restriction for localized SAR in a human, and hence these results can not be generalized to all antenna types. Moreover, it was shown that the limit for localized exposure could be exceeded before the limit for the whole‐body average SAR, if the distance to the antenna was less than 240 mm. Bioelectromagnetics 30:307–312, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.