z-logo
Premium
The bioavailability of oral nifedipine formulations: A statistical and simulation approach
Author(s) -
Kozjek F.,
Primozic S.,
Mrhar A.,
Karba R.,
Raemsch K. D.,
Janezic A.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
biopharmaceutics and drug disposition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.419
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1099-081X
pISSN - 0142-2782
DOI - 10.1002/bdd.2510080104
Subject(s) - bioequivalence , bioavailability , cmax , pharmacokinetics , pharmacology , nifedipine , crossover study , chemistry , dosing , confidence interval , oral administration , chromatography , mathematics , medicine , statistics , placebo , alternative medicine , organic chemistry , pathology , calcium
Abstract The bioequivalence of three oral forms of nifedipine was assessed in a triple crossover study on 12 healthy volunteers. Single 10 mg dose was given and ten blood samples were drawn during the first 8 h after administration. Highly sensitive gas chromatographic method was used for the nifedipine assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters which describe bioavailability and general kinetic behaviour of the drug (AUC, C max , t max , beta, MRT) were calculated from individual plasma profiles. They were subjected to statistical analysis (paired t ‐test, Hauck's inverted t ‐test, and Westlake's method of confidence intervals). Analogue‐hybrid simulation and identification was used to generate plasma profiles of nifedipine after single and multiple dosing. Averaged plasma concentrations were used for this purpose. The three formulations studied were bioequivalent in terms of the rate of absorption. The simulation proved to be an efficient tool to substitute in vivo multiple dosing studies for assessment of bioavailability. The specific statistical methods should be preferred in bioequivalence data evaluation due to their greater power and inclusion of extraneous bioequivalence limits interval. Despite the differences among the formulations studied, each one of them should be viewed according to its intended clinical use.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here