Premium
Yeast immobilization systems for second‐generation ethanol production: actual trends and future perspectives
Author(s) -
ChacónNavarrete Helena,
Martín Carlos,
MorenoGarcía Jaime
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.931
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1932-1031
pISSN - 1932-104X
DOI - 10.1002/bbb.2250
Subject(s) - biofuel , yeast , reuse , ethanol fuel , hydrolysate , fermentation , biochemical engineering , chemistry , calcium alginate , pulp and paper industry , microbiology and biotechnology , production (economics) , process engineering , biochemistry , waste management , biology , engineering , calcium , organic chemistry , macroeconomics , hydrolysis , economics
Yeast immobilization with low‐cost carrier materials is a suitable strategy to optimize the fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for the production of second‐generation (2G) ethanol. It is defined as the physical confinement of intact cells to a certain region of space (the carrier) with the preservation of their biological activity. This technological approach facilitates promising strategies for second‐generation bioethanol production due to the enhancement of the fermentation performance that is expected to be achieved. Using immobilized cells, the resistance to inhibitors contained in the hydrolysates and the co‐utilization of sugars are improved, along with facilitating separation operations and the reuse of yeast in new production cycles. Until now, the most common immobilization technology used calcium alginate as a yeast carrier but other supports such as biochar or multispecies biofilm membranes have emerged as interesting alternatives. This review compiles updated information about cell carriers and yeast‐cell requirements for immobilization, and the benefits and drawbacks of different immobilization systems for second‐generation bioethanol production are investigated and compared.