Premium
Techno‐economic and life‐cycle assessments of small‐scale biorefineries for isobutene and xylo‐oligosaccharides production: a comparative study in Portugal and Chile
Author(s) -
Lopes Tiago F.,
Carvalheiro Florbela,
Duarte Luís C.,
Gírio Francisco,
Quintero Julián A.,
Aroca Germán
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.931
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1932-1031
pISSN - 1932-104X
DOI - 10.1002/bbb.2036
Subject(s) - biorefinery , life cycle assessment , raw material , corn stover , pulp and paper industry , anaerobic digestion , bioconversion , environmental science , biofuel , production (economics) , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , waste management , engineering , fermentation , food science , economics , biology , organic chemistry , methane , macroeconomics
Abstract This work presents a comparative simulation study involving the techno‐economic and environmental assessment of lignocellulosic‐based small‐scale biorefineries, integrated with a piggery waste‐based anaerobic digestion platform (ADB), located in Portugal and Chile. Two main products are obtained: isobutene and xylo‐oligosaccharides (XOS). The bioproduction of isobutene using a genetically engineered organism ( Escherichia coli ), coupled with the removal and purification of high added‐value XOS, obtained after a feedstock hydrothermal pre‐treatment, was evaluated. Two lignocellulosic agricultural wastes were used: corn stover in the Portuguese case study and wheat straw in Chilean case study. Both processes were simulated using the Aspen Plus modeling software tool, while the Aspen Process Economic Analyzer was used to carry out the economic evaluation. The simulation results were validated with experimental data from the laboratory and the literature. An economic assessment was performed considering the different locations of both biorefineries. A life‐cycle analysis (LCA) was also applied to evaluate the differences in environmental impacts on both locations. The results showed that the isobutene / XOS biorefinery concept was economically viable in both Portugal and Chile, mainly due to the high market value of XOS. The biorefinery has lower production costs for isobutene and XOS (1 US$/kg of isobutene and 1.18 US$/kg of XOS) when located in Portugal, as compared with Chile (1.14 US$/kg of isobutene and 1.56 US$/kg of XOS). Conversely, it leads to less environmental impact when located in Chile: 48.8 kg CO2eq. /GJ isobutene , in comparison to 60.7 kg CO2eq. /GJ isobutene in Portugal. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd