z-logo
Premium
A comparison of P rotein A chromatographic stationary phases: Performance characteristics for monoclonal antibody purification
Author(s) -
Liu Zhuo,
Mostafa Sigma S.,
Shukla Abhinav A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biotechnology and applied biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.468
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1470-8744
pISSN - 0885-4513
DOI - 10.1002/bab.1243
Subject(s) - yield (engineering) , downstream processing , chromatography , monoclonal antibody , chemistry , elution , physics , biology , antibody , thermodynamics , immunology
P rotein A chromatography remains the dominant capture step used during the downstream purification of monoclonal antibodies (m A bs). With the recent expiry of the R epligen patent on recombinant P rotein A , a variety of new P rotein A resins have been introduced in the market. Given productivity limitations during downstream processing that have come into sharper focus with the recent increase in cell culture titers for m A bs, the selection of an appropriate P rotein A resin has direct implications on the overall process economics of m A b production. The performance of seven different P rotein A chromatographic resins was compared with respect to static binding capacity and dynamic binding capacity as a function of flow rate. This data was translated into a comparison of productivity (g m A b purified per unit resin volume per unit time) for the seven stationary phases. In addition, elution p H and host cell protein impurity levels after product capture on each of these resins were determined. The current article provides an effective methodology and dataset for the selection of the optimal P rotein A chromatographic resin.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here