z-logo
Premium
More than maths and mindreading: Sex differences in empathizing/systemizing covariance
Author(s) -
Valla Jeffrey M.,
Ganzel Barbara L.,
Yoder Keith J.,
Chen Grace M.,
Lyman Laura T.,
Sidari Anthony P.,
Keller Alex E.,
Maendel Jeffrey W.,
Perlman Jordan E.,
Wong Stephanie K.L.,
Belmonte Matthew K.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
autism research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.656
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1939-3806
pISSN - 1939-3792
DOI - 10.1002/aur.143
Subject(s) - psychology , autism , developmental psychology , empathy , social cognition , cognition , perception , cognitive psychology , social psychology , neuroscience
Empathizing–Systemizing theory posits a continuum of cognitive traits extending from autism into normal cognitive variation. Covariance data on empathizing and systemizing traits have alternately suggested inversely dependent, independent, and sex‐dependent (one sex dependent, the other independent) structures. A total of 144 normal undergraduates (65 men, 79 women) completed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes, Embedded Figures, and Benton face recognition tests, the Autism Spectrum Quotient, and measures of digit length ratio and field of study; some also completed tests of motion coherence threshold (64) and go/no‐go motor inhibition (128). Empathizing and systemizing traits were independent in women, but largely dependent in men. In men, level of systemizing skill required by field of study was directly related to social interactive and mindreading deficits; men's social impairments correlated with prolonged go/no‐go response times, and men tended to apply systemizing strategies to solve problems of empathizing or global processing: rapid perceptual disembedding predicted heightened sensitivity to facial emotion. In women, level of systemizing in field was related to male‐typical digit ratios and autistic superiorities in detail orientation, but not to autistic social and communicative impairments; and perceptual disembedding was related to social interactive skills but independent of facial emotion and visual motion perception.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here