Premium
MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism
Author(s) -
Roberts Timothy P.L.,
Khan Sarah Y.,
Rey Mike,
Monroe Justin F.,
Can Katelyn,
Blaskey Lisa,
Woldoff Sarah,
Qasmieh Saba,
Gandal Mike,
Schmidt Gwen L.,
Zarnow Deborah M.,
Levy Susan E.,
Edgar J. Christopher
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
autism research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.656
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1939-3806
pISSN - 1939-3792
DOI - 10.1002/aur.111
Subject(s) - magnetoencephalography , audiology , psychology , lateralization of brain function , endophenotype , autism , autism spectrum disorder , latency (audio) , auditory cortex , right hemisphere , developmental psychology , neuroscience , electroencephalography , cognition , medicine , electrical engineering , engineering
Abstract Motivated by auditory and speech deficits in autism spectrum disorders (ASD), the frequency dependence of superior temporal gyrus (STG) 50 msec (M50) and 100 msec (M100) neuromagnetic auditory evoked field responses in children with ASD and typically developing controls were evaluated. Whole‐cortex magnetoencephalography (MEG) was obtained from 17 typically developing children and 25 children with ASD. Subjects were presented tones with frequencies of 200, 300, 500, and 1,000 Hz, and left and right STG M50 and M100 STG activity was examined. No M50 latency or amplitude Group differences were observed. In the right hemisphere, a Group×Frequency ANOVA on M100 latency produced a main effect for Group ( P =0.01), with an average M100 latency delay of 11 msec in children with ASD. In addition, only in the control group was the expected association of earlier M100 latencies in older than younger children observed. Group latency differences remained significant when hierarchical regression analyses partialed out M100 variance associated with age, IQ, and language ability (all P ‐values <0.05). Examining the right‐hemisphere 500 Hz condition (where the largest latency differences were observed), a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 81%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86% was obtained at a threshold of 116 msec. The M100 latency delay indicates disruption of encoding simple sensory information. Given similar findings in language impaired and nonlanguage impaired ASD subjects, a right‐hemisphere M100 latency delay appears to be an electrophysiological endophenotype for autism.