Premium
Magnetic Relaxation Studies on Trigonal Bipyramidal Cobalt(II) Complexes
Author(s) -
Shao Feng,
Cahier Benjamin,
Wang YiTing,
Yang FengLei,
Rivière Eric,
Guillot Régis,
Guihéry Nathalie,
Tong JiaPing,
Mallah Talal
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
chemistry – an asian journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.18
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1861-471X
pISSN - 1861-4728
DOI - 10.1002/asia.201901511
Subject(s) - trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry , diamagnetism , chemistry , crystallography , relaxation (psychology) , cobalt , trigonal crystal system , magnetic relaxation , molecule , dipole , stereochemistry , magnetization , magnetic field , inorganic chemistry , crystal structure , physics , psychology , social psychology , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
We report the preparation and the full characterization of a novel mononuclear trigonal bipyramidal Co II complex [Co(NS 3 i Pr )Br](BPh 4 ) ( 1 ) with the tetradentate sulfur‐containing ligand NS 3 i Pr (N(CH 2 CH 2 SCH(CH 3 ) 2 ) 3 ). The comparison of its magnetic behaviour with those of two previously reported compounds [Co(NS 3 i Pr )Cl](BPh 4 ) ( 2 ) and [Co(NS 3 t Bu )Br](ClO 4 ) ( 3 ) (NS 3 t Bu =N(CH 2 CH 2 SC(CH 3 ) 3 ) 3 ) with similar structures shows that 1 displays a single‐molecule magnet behaviour with the longest magnetic relaxation time (0.051 s) at T= 1.8 K, which is almost thirty times larger than that of 3 (0.0019 s) and more than three times larger than that of 2 (0.015 s), though its effective energy barrier (26 cm −1 ) is smaller. Compound 1 , which contains two crystallographically independent molecules, presents smaller rhombic parameters ( E= 1.45 and 0.59 cm −1 ) than 2 ( E= 2.05 and 1.02 cm −1 ) and 3 ( E= 2.00 and 0.80 cm −1 ) obtained from theoretical calculations. Compounds 2 and 3 have almost the same axial ( D ) and rhombic ( E ) parameter values, but present a large difference of their effective energy barrier and magnetic relaxation which may be attributed to the larger volume of BPh 4 − than ClO 4 − leading to larger diamagnetic dilution (weaker magnetic dipolar interaction) for 2 than for 3 . The combination of these factors leads to a much slower magnetic relaxation for 1 than for the two other compounds.