Premium
Insights into the Difference Between Rotaxane and Pseudorotaxane
Author(s) -
Sun HeLue,
Zhang HengYi,
Dai Zhen,
Han Xu,
Liu Yu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
chemistry – an asian journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.18
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1861-471X
pISSN - 1861-4728
DOI - 10.1002/asia.201601545
Subject(s) - rotaxane , ferrocene , azobenzene , chemistry , isomerization , covalent bond , molecule , stereochemistry , axle , crystallography , supramolecular chemistry , organic chemistry , electrochemistry , electrode , catalysis , mechanical engineering , engineering
Abstract Rotaxane and pseudorotaxane are two types of mechanically interlocked molecular architectures, and there is a clear topological difference and boundary between them. In this work, a “suggested [2]rotaxane 1 ⊂α‐CD” was constructed based on axle molecule 1 bearing two terminal ferrocene groups and a wheel component α‐cyclodextrin (α‐CD), but the result obtained indicated that the ferrocene group cannot prevent α‐CD dethreading under UV irradiation. That is, 1 ⊂α‐CD is just a pseudo[2]rotaxane. Furthermore, the two ferrocene groups in 1 ⊂α‐CD were encapsulated by two cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) units to obtain a heteropseudo[4]rotaxane 1 ⊂α‐CD⋅2CB[7]. This heteropseudo[4]rotaxane displayed high stability towards harsh temperatures and the isomerization of azobenzene in 1 , so it can be regarded as a [2]rotaxane. In this [2]rotaxane, the stoppers are not the bulky groups covalently bonded to the axle, but the cyclic CB[7] units connected through noncovalent interactions.