Premium
Insights into the Difference Between Rotaxane and Pseudorotaxane
Author(s) -
Sun HeLue,
Zhang HengYi,
Dai Zhen,
Han Xu,
Liu Yu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
chemistry – an asian journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.18
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1861-471X
pISSN - 1861-4728
DOI - 10.1002/asia.201601545
Subject(s) - rotaxane , ferrocene , azobenzene , chemistry , isomerization , covalent bond , molecule , stereochemistry , axle , crystallography , supramolecular chemistry , organic chemistry , electrochemistry , electrode , catalysis , mechanical engineering , engineering
Rotaxane and pseudorotaxane are two types of mechanically interlocked molecular architectures, and there is a clear topological difference and boundary between them. In this work, a “suggested [2]rotaxane 1 ⊂α‐CD” was constructed based on axle molecule 1 bearing two terminal ferrocene groups and a wheel component α‐cyclodextrin (α‐CD), but the result obtained indicated that the ferrocene group cannot prevent α‐CD dethreading under UV irradiation. That is, 1 ⊂α‐CD is just a pseudo[2]rotaxane. Furthermore, the two ferrocene groups in 1 ⊂α‐CD were encapsulated by two cucurbit[7]uril (CB[7]) units to obtain a heteropseudo[4]rotaxane 1 ⊂α‐CD⋅2CB[7]. This heteropseudo[4]rotaxane displayed high stability towards harsh temperatures and the isomerization of azobenzene in 1 , so it can be regarded as a [2]rotaxane. In this [2]rotaxane, the stoppers are not the bulky groups covalently bonded to the axle, but the cyclic CB[7] units connected through noncovalent interactions.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom