Premium
Circularly Polarized Luminescence of Chiral Pt(pppb)Cl (pppbH=1‐pyridyl‐3‐(4,5‐pinenopyridyl)benzene) Aggregate in the Excited State
Author(s) -
Tanaka Saori,
Sato Kyohei,
Ichida Kyoko,
Abe Taichi,
Tsubomura Taro,
Suzuki Takayoshi,
Shinozaki Kazuteru
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
chemistry – an asian journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.18
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1861-471X
pISSN - 1861-4728
DOI - 10.1002/asia.201500985
Subject(s) - trimer , excited state , excimer , luminescence , dihedral angle , chemistry , stacking , dimer , crystallography , platinum , photochemistry , monomer , metal , moiety , materials science , stereochemistry , fluorescence , molecule , atomic physics , organic chemistry , hydrogen bond , physics , optoelectronics , polymer , quantum mechanics , catalysis
We prepared enantiomers of chiral Pt II complexes, Pt(pppb)Cl and Pt(pppb)CN (pppbH=1‐pyridyl‐3‐(4,5‐pinenopyridyl)benzene), and measured their CPL (circularly polarized luminescence) spectra for excimer and trimer emission. The contribution of the pinene moiety to CPL was considerably low for the π–π* emission of the monomer but large for MMLCT (metal‐metal‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer) of the excimer and trimer which had a helical structure induced in a face‐to‐face stacking fashion. The trimer CPL for (+)‐Pt(pppb)Cl was larger in intensity than that of excimer CPL; on the other hand, that for (+)‐Pt(pppb)CN was opposite in sign compared with that of excimer CPL. We conclude that differences in the excited‐state structure of the aggregate between Pt(pppb)Cl and Pt(pppb)CN account for the variation in the CPL spectra. By the aid of TD‐DFT calculations it was predicted that the dihedral angle θ (Cl‐Pt‐Pt‐Cl) was 50–60° or 110–140° for Pt(pppb)Cl aggregates and 160° for Pt(pppb)CN aggregates.