z-logo
Premium
A longitudinal study in learning preferences and academic performance in first year medical school
Author(s) -
Hu Yenya,
Gao Hong,
Wofford Marcia M.,
Violato Claudio
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
anatomical sciences education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.126
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1935-9780
pISSN - 1935-9772
DOI - 10.1002/ase.1757
Subject(s) - multimodality , kinesthetic learning , psychology , modality (human–computer interaction) , medical school , medical education , class (philosophy) , reading (process) , longitudinal study , mathematics education , association (psychology) , modalities , medicine , computer science , pathology , sociology , social science , human–computer interaction , artificial intelligence , world wide web , political science , law , psychotherapist
This is a longitudinal study of first year medical students that investigates the relationship between the pattern change of the learning preferences and academic performance. Using the visual, auditory, reading‐writing, and kinesthetic inventory at the beginning of the first and second year for the same class, it was found that within the first year, 36% of the class remained unimodal (single) modality learners (SS), 14% changed from unimodal to multimodality learners (SM), 27% changed from multimodality to unimodal modality learners (MS) and 21% remained as multimodality learners (MM). Among the academic performance through subsequent didactic blocks from Clinical Anatomy, Cell and Subcellular Processes to Medical Neuroscience during first year, the SM group made more significant improvement compared to the SS group. Semi‐structured interview results from the SM group showed that students made this transition between the Clinical Anatomy course and the middle of the Medical Neuroscience course, in an effort to improve their performance. This study suggests that the transition from unimodal to multimodality learning among academically struggling students improved their academic performance in the first year of medical school. Therefore, this may be considered as part of academic advising tools for struggling students to improve their academic performances. Anat Sci Educ 11: 488–495. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here