z-logo
Premium
Anatomy adventure: A board game for enhancing understanding of anatomy
Author(s) -
Anyanwu Emeka G.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
anatomical sciences education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.126
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1935-9780
pISSN - 1935-9772
DOI - 10.1002/ase.1389
Subject(s) - test (biology) , adventure , psychology , gross anatomy , psychosocial , curriculum , perception , medical education , medicine , applied psychology , anatomy , pedagogy , computer science , paleontology , neuroscience , psychiatry , biology , operating system
Certain negative factors such as fear, loss of concentration and interest in the course, lack of confidence, and undue stress have been associated with the study of anatomy. These are factors most often provoked by the unusually large curriculum, nature of the course, and the psychosocial impact of dissection. As a palliative measure, Anatomy Adventure, a board game on anatomy was designed to reduce some of these pressures, emphasize student centered and collaborative learning styles, and add fun to the process of learning while promoting understanding and retention of the subject. To assess these objectives, 95 out of over 150 medical and dental students who expressed willingness to be part of the study were recruited and divided into a Game group and a Non‐game group. A pretest written examination was given to both groups, participants in the Game group were allowed to play the game for ten days, after which a post‐test examination was also given. A 20‐item questionnaire rated on a three‐point scale to access student's perception of the game was given to the game group. The post‐test scores of the game group were significantly higher ( P  < 0.05) than those of the non‐game counterparts. Also the post‐test score of the game based group was significantly better ( P  < 0.05) than their pretest. The students in their feedback noted in very high proportions that the game was interesting, highly informative, encouraged team work, improved their attitude, and perception to gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 7: 153–160. © 2013 American Association of Anatomists.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here