Premium
Transcriptional Associations of Osteoarthritis‐Mediated Loss of Epigenetic Control in Articular Cartilage
Author(s) -
den Hollander Wouter,
Ramos Yolande F. M.,
Bomer Nils,
Elzinga Stefan,
van der Breggen Ruud,
Lakenberg Nico,
de Dijcker Wesley J.,
Suchiman H. Eka D.,
Duijnisveld Bouke J.,
HouwingDuistermaat Jeanine J.,
Slagboom P. Eline,
Bos Steffan D.,
Nelissen Rob G. H. H.,
Meulenbelt Ingrid
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
arthritis and rheumatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.106
H-Index - 314
eISSN - 2326-5205
pISSN - 2326-5191
DOI - 10.1002/art.39162
Subject(s) - epigenetics , dna methylation , cpg site , biology , single nucleotide polymorphism , methylation , genetics , gene , cartilage , osteoarthritis , regulation of gene expression , gene expression , genotype , medicine , pathology , anatomy , alternative medicine
Objective To identify osteoarthritis (OA) progression–modulating pathways in articular cartilage and their respective regulatory epigenetic and genetic determinants in end‐stage disease. Methods Transcriptional activity of CpG was assessed using gene expression data and DNA methylation data for preserved and lesional articular cartilage samples. Disease‐responsive transcriptionally active CpG were identified by means of differential methylation between preserved and lesional cartilage. Transcriptionally relevant genetic determinants were addressed by means of single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) proximal to the OA‐responsive transcriptionally active CpG. Statistical analyses were corrected for age, sex, joint, and technical covariates. A random effect was included to correct for possible correlations between paired samples. Results Of 9,838 transcribed genes in articular cartilage, 2,324 correlated with the methylation status of 3,748 transcriptionally active CpG; both negative (n = 1,741) and positive (n = 2,007) correlations were observed. Hypomethylation and hypermethylation (false discovery rate of <0.05, |Δβ| > 0.05) were observed for 62 and 25 transcriptionally active CpG, respectively, covering 70 unique genes. Enrichment for developmental and extracellular matrix maintenance pathways indicated possible reactivation of endochondral ossification. Finally, we observed 31 and 26 genes for which methylation and expression, respectively, were additionally affected by genetic variation. Conclusion We identified tissue‐specific genes involved in OA disease progression, reflected by genetic and pathologic epigenetic regulation of transcription, primarily at genes involved in development. Therefore, transcriptionally active SNPs near these genes may serve as putative susceptibility alleles. Our results constitute an important step toward understanding the reported widespread epigenetic changes occurring in OA articular cartilage and toward subsequent development of treatments targeting disease‐driving pathways.