z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Rilonacept (Interleukin‐1 Trap) in the prevention of acute gout flares during initiation of urate‐lowering therapy: Results of a phase II randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial
Author(s) -
Schumacher H. Ralph,
Sundy John S.,
Terkeltaub Robert,
Knapp Howard R.,
Mellis Scott J.,
Stahl Neil,
Yancopoulos George D.,
Soo Yuhwen,
KingDavis Shirletta,
Weinstein Steven P.,
Radin Allen R.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
arthritis & rheumatism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1529-0131
pISSN - 0004-3591
DOI - 10.1002/art.33412
Subject(s) - medicine , gout , placebo , adverse effect , canakinumab , discontinuation , randomized controlled trial , anakinra , alternative medicine , disease , pathology
Objective To evaluate the interleukin‐1 inhibitor rilonacept (Interleukin‐1 Trap) for prevention of gout flares occurring in the first few months following initiation of urate‐lowering therapy. Methods In this double‐blind study, adult patients with hyperuricemia and gout were randomized to receive rilonacept administered subcutaneously once per week (loading dose 320 mg followed by 160 mg weekly) or placebo, and started on allopurinol (300 mg/day, titrated to serum urate <6 mg/dl). At study visits, physical and laboratory assessments were performed and information on any adverse events was ascertained. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the rilonacept and placebo groups (n = 41 and n = 42, respectively). The mean number of gout flares per patient through week 12 (primary efficacy end point) was markedly lower in the rilonacept group than in the placebo group (0.15 [6 flares] versus 0.79 [33 flares]; P = 0.0011). Fewer flares were observed with rilonacept as early as 4 weeks after initiation of treatment ( P = 0.007). The proportion of patients experiencing a flare during the 12 weeks was lower in the rilonacept group than in the placebo group (14.6% versus 45.2%; P = 0.0037). No rebound in the flare rate was observed for 6 weeks after discontinuation of rilonacept or placebo at week 16. Adverse events were similar between groups, and no deaths or serious infectious adverse events were reported; the most common adverse events were infections (14.6% and 26.2% of rilonacept‐ and placebo‐treated patients, respectively) and musculoskeletal disorders (14.6% and 21.4%, respectively). A higher percentage of rilonacept‐treated patients (98%) compared with placebo‐treated patients (79%) completed the primary 12‐week evaluation period ( P = 0.015). Conclusion The current findings indicate that rilonacept significantly reduces the frequency of gout flares during the initial period of treatment with urate‐lowering therapy, with a favorable safety profile.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here