z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reactivity with dichotomous determinants of Ro 60 stratifies autoantibody responses in lupus and primary Sjögren's syndrome
Author(s) -
Reed Joanne H.,
Dudek Nadine L.,
Osborne Shan E.,
Kaufman Kenneth M.,
Jackson Michael W.,
Purcell Anthony W.,
Gordon Tom P.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
arthritis & rheumatism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1529-0131
pISSN - 0004-3591
DOI - 10.1002/art.27370
Subject(s) - autoantibody , epitope , flow cytometry , intracellular , antibody , lupus erythematosus , antigen , immunology , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , biology , biochemistry
Abstract Objective Analysis of B cell determinants of Ro 60 exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells (apotopes) or intracellular epitopes provides insight into the structural forms of the autoantigen that break immune tolerance. This study was initiated to compare anti–Ro 60 responses in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) against membrane‐bound and intracellular forms of Ro 60. Methods The reactivity of autoantibodies from patients with SLE and primary SS to Ro 60 apotopes and epitopes was assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry and solid‐phase immunoassay. Anti–Ro 60 IgG was eluted from early apoptotic cells or recombinant Ro 60 immobilized on nitrocellulose, and binding to membrane‐bound and intracellular forms of Ro 60 was quantitated by flow cytometry. Results An immunodominant apotope, which was recognized by IgG from a subset of SLE patients with anti‐Ro, but not anti‐La, autoantibodies, was mapped to a region forming a helix‐loop‐helix at the apical tip of the Ro 60 molecule. Immobilization of this region to the solid phase exposed an epitope that was recognized by IgG from primary SS and SLE patients whose sera had both anti‐Ro and anti‐La autoantibodies. Autoantibodies eluted from either the surface of apoptotic cells or the Ro 60 epitope on the solid phase were non–cross‐reactive and specifically recognized membrane‐bound or cytoplasmic forms of Ro 60. Conclusion This is the first example of a dichotomy of human autoantibody responses against mutually exclusive determinants linked to a single domain of a systemic autoantigen and supports a model in which tolerance is broken by different immunogenic forms of Ro 60.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here