z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Systemic lupus international collaborating clinics renal activity/response exercise: Development of a renal activity score and renal response index
Author(s) -
Petri Michelle,
Kasita Nuntana,
Lee ShinSeok,
Link Kimberly,
Magder Laurence,
Bae SangCheol,
Hanly John G.,
Isenberg David A.,
Nived Ola,
Sturfelt Gunnar,
van Vollenhoven Ronald,
Wallace Daniel J.,
Alarcón Graciela S.,
Adu Dwomoa,
AvilaCasado Carmen,
Bernatsky Sasha R.,
Bruce Ian N.,
Clarke Ann E.,
Contreras Gabriel,
Fine Derek M.,
Gladman Dafna D.,
Gordon Caroline,
Kalunian Kenneth C.,
Madaio Michael P.,
Rovin Brad H.,
SanchezGuerrero Jorge,
Steinsson Kristjan,
Aranow Cynthia,
Balow James E.,
Buyon Jill P.,
Ginzler Ellen M.,
Khamashta Munther A.,
Urowitz Murray B.,
Dooley Mary Anne,
Merrill Joan T.,
RamseyGoldman Rosalind,
Font Josef,
Tumlin James,
Stoll Thomas,
Zoma Asad
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
arthritis & rheumatism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1529-0131
pISSN - 0004-3591
DOI - 10.1002/art.23456
Subject(s) - medicine , proteinuria , lupus nephritis , systemic lupus erythematosus , confidence interval , urinalysis , physical therapy , urine , disease , kidney
Abstract Objective To develop a measure of renal activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and use it to develop a renal response index. Methods Abstracted data from the medical records of 215 patients with lupus nephritis were sent to 8 nephrologists and 29 rheumatologists for rating. Seven nephrologists and 22 rheumatologists completed the ratings. Each physician rated each patient visit with respect to renal disease activity (none, mild, moderate, or severe). Using the most commonly selected rating for each patient as the gold standard, stepwise regression modeling was performed to identify the variables most related to renal disease activity, and these variables were then used to create an activity score. This activity score could then be applied to 2 consecutive visits to define a renal response index. Results The renal activity score was computed as follows: proteinuria 0.5–1 gm/day (3 points), proteinuria >1–3 gm/day (5 points), proteinuria >3 gm/day (11 points), urine red blood cell count >10/high‐power field (3 points), and urine white blood cell count >10/high‐power field (1 point). The chance‐adjusted agreement between the renal response index derived from the activity score applied to the paired visits and the plurality physician response rating was 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.59–0.79). Conclusion Ratings derived from this index for rating of renal response showed reasonable agreement with physician ratings in a pilot study. The index will require further refinement, testing, and validation. A data‐driven approach to create renal activity and renal response indices will be useful in both clinical care and research settings.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here