Arthritis self‐management program variations: Three studies
Arthritis & RheumatismPeer ReviewedLorig Kate +41998Journals
Objectives. (1) Determine strengths and weaknesses of the Arthritis Self‐Management Program (ASMP). (2) Compare 3‐ and 6‐week ASMP. (3) Evaluate 1.5‐hour arthritis program. Methods. Study 1: Qualitative methods incorporating incomplete block design. Study 2: Comparison of 3‐ and 6‐week outcomes. Study 3: Pretest/ posttest comparison. Results. Study 1: Pain management, exercise, and sharing ranked as the most useful aspects of the ASMP. Nutrition, medications, and making decisions about nontraditional treatments ranked least useful. Study 2: Six‐week ASMP subjects improved pain, health distress, illness impact, exercise, cognitive pain management, self‐efficacy, and reduced visits to physicians (P < 0.05). Three‐week subjects improved health distress, cognitive pain management, and self‐efficacy (P < 0.05). Study 3: Improved knowledge, self‐efficacy, and pain (P < 0.05). Conclusions. The traditional 6‐week ASMP is more effective than a 3‐week version. A 1.5‐hour community program is effective in increasing knowledge, self‐efficacy, and contact with the Arthritis Foundation.
The content you want is available to Zendy users.
Already have an account? Sign inHaving issues? Contact support