
Arthritis self‐management program variations: Three studies
Author(s) -
Lorig Kate,
González Virginia M.,
Laurent Diana D.,
Morgan Lisa,
Laris B. A.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
arthritis & rheumatism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1529-0131
pISSN - 0004-3591
DOI - 10.1002/art.1790110604
Subject(s) - medicine , physical therapy , distress , self management , arthritis , clinical psychology , machine learning , computer science
Objectives. (1) Determine strengths and weaknesses of the Arthritis Self‐Management Program (ASMP). (2) Compare 3‐ and 6‐week ASMP. (3) Evaluate 1.5‐hour arthritis program. Methods. Study 1: Qualitative methods incorporating incomplete block design. Study 2: Comparison of 3‐ and 6‐week outcomes. Study 3: Pretest/ posttest comparison. Results. Study 1: Pain management, exercise, and sharing ranked as the most useful aspects of the ASMP. Nutrition, medications, and making decisions about nontraditional treatments ranked least useful. Study 2: Six‐week ASMP subjects improved pain, health distress, illness impact, exercise, cognitive pain management, self‐efficacy, and reduced visits to physicians (P < 0.05). Three‐week subjects improved health distress, cognitive pain management, and self‐efficacy (P < 0.05). Study 3: Improved knowledge, self‐efficacy, and pain (P < 0.05). Conclusions. The traditional 6‐week ASMP is more effective than a 3‐week version. A 1.5‐hour community program is effective in increasing knowledge, self‐efficacy, and contact with the Arthritis Foundation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom