z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Numerical scoring systems for the anatomic evolution of osteoarthritis of the finger joints
Author(s) -
Verbruggen Gust,
Veys Eric M.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
arthritis & rheumatism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1529-0131
pISSN - 0004-3591
DOI - 10.1002/art.1780390221
Subject(s) - osteoarthritis , medicine , orthodontics , anatomy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , pathology , alternative medicine
Objective . To assess and score the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) of the distal and proximal interpha‐langeal (DIP and PIP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. Methods . Forty‐six patients with OA of the finger joints were followed up for 3 years; 36 of them were followed up for 5 years. Posteroanterior radiographs of the hands were obtained at the start of this prospective study and at yearly intervals. The scoring systems used were based on the increased incidence of OA during consecutive years in previously normal joints, the radiologic progression of the anatomic lesions in the affected finger joints, and the consecutive pathologic phases recognized in the course of the disease. Results . Significant increases both in the numbers of affected DIP, PIP, and MCP joints per subject and in the anatomic progression of the disease (changes in osteophyte growth, loss of joint space, and subchondral cysts or sclerosis) in the different finger joints of each patient were recorded during the 3 and 5 years of followup. In ∼40% of the patients, the classic picture of OA was complicated by erosive changes, which preceded a period in which repair phenomena in the “eroded” finger joints led to the generation of a new subchondral plate covered by cartilaginous tissue. Huge osteophytes were then responsible for the nodular aspect of the affected finger joints. Conclusion . OA of the finger joints is progressive in nature and passes through predictable phases. The recognition of and the attribution of a score to these respective phases made assessing the progression of OA less time‐consuming and led to the same conclusions as when the anatomic progression was scored.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here