Premium
Targeting GluN2B‐Containing N ‐Methyl‐ D ‐aspartate Receptors: Design, Synthesis, and Binding Affinity Evaluation of Novel 3‐Substituted Indoles
Author(s) -
Buemi Maria Rosa,
Luca Laura De,
Ferro Stefania,
Gitto Rosaria
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
archiv der pharmazie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.468
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1521-4184
pISSN - 0365-6233
DOI - 10.1002/ardp.201400061
Subject(s) - chemistry , indole test , stereochemistry , in vitro , in silico , affinities , nmda receptor , lead compound , receptor , potency , combinatorial chemistry , docking (animal) , derivative (finance) , structure–activity relationship , chemical synthesis , binding affinities , biochemistry , medicine , nursing , economics , financial economics , gene
In an effort to improve our knowledge about structure–affinity relationships (SARs) for a class of 3‐substituted‐indole derivatives as GluN2B‐containing N ‐methyl‐ D ‐aspartate‐type receptor (NMDAR) ligands, we herein describe the design, synthesis, and preliminary screening of a new series of molecules. The in vitro determination of binding affinities suggested that 5‐hydroxy‐ and 6‐hydroxyindole derivatives 12 and 13 were active ligands. Generally, the novel compounds proved to be less potent than their homologs previously reported as promising neuroprotective agents. In fact, our lead compound 3‐(4‐benzylpiperidin‐1‐yl)‐1‐(5‐hydroxy‐1 H ‐indol‐3‐yl)ethan‐1‐one ( 2 ) was about 10‐fold more active than the new propan‐1‐one derivative ( 12 ). To rationalize the low potency of the new analog 12 , docking studies were also performed and the in silico results were consistent with the in vitro data.