Open AccessIntellectual property conundrum for the biological sciences
Author(s) -
Olds James L.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
the anatomical record part b: the new anatomist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1552-4914
pISSN - 1552-4906
DOI - 10.1002/ar.b.20008
Subject(s) - intellectual property , property (philosophy) , engineering ethics , sociology , epistemology , political science , philosophy , law , engineering
Policy regarding academically generated biomedical intellectual property (IP) has been shaped by two important events: the Vannevar Bush report to then President Roosevelt in 1945 and the Bayh‐Dole Act of 1980. This policy, which vests the intellectual property produced from federally funded biomedical research from the government to the academic institution, was designed to promote technology transfer and thus promote the health of the U.S. economy. However, the policy has led to significant challenges, particularly in implementation. Here it is argued that the difficulties are due to differences in the structure of motivations between biomedical scientists, institutional officials, and private sector entrepreneurs. Understanding these differences may lead to a review of policy with the goal of enhancing technology transfer for the future. Anat Rec (Part B: New Anat) 277B:5–9, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.