Premium
Comparative Feeding Biomechanics of Lystrosaurus and the Generalized Dicynodont Oudenodon
Author(s) -
Jasinoski Sandra C.,
Rayfield Emily J.,
Chinsamy Anusuya
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the anatomical record: advances in integrative anatomy and evolutionary biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.678
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1932-8494
pISSN - 1932-8486
DOI - 10.1002/ar.20906
Subject(s) - bite force quotient , masticatory force , crania , skull , anatomy , premaxilla , fibrous joint , biting , biomechanics , biology , orthodontics , paleontology , medicine , maxilla
Differences in cranial morphology among the Dicynodontia have been correlated with changes in masticatory function, and hence, dietary preference. Although the derived masticatory apparatus of dicynodonts allowed propaliny, it has previously been hypothesized that Lystrosaurus primarily utilized powerful orthal jaw movements to process fibrous vegetation. Cranial specializations of Lystrosaurus , such as shortened and deepened cranium and a mobile premaxilla‐nasal suture, are thought to have increased the efficiency of its masticatory system compared with generalized Permian dicynodonts. Here we aim to test this assertion using biomechanical modeling techniques. We use finite element analysis (FEA) and a study of cranial functional morphology to compare the biomechanical performance of the crania of Lystrosaurus and Oudenodon , a generalized dicynodont, during orthal bite simulations. Muscle forces were estimated for each dicynodont using the dry skull method and applied to each cranium to produce a reaction force at a bite point. Patterns and average magnitude of Von Mises stress in each dicynodont cranium and in segmented regions of interest were assessed. During orthal bite simulations, higher stress occurs throughout the Oudenodon cranium, indicating that the cranium of Lystrosaurus is more resistant to normal, static feeding loads. Despite this difference in stress magnitude, patterns of stress are similar within both taxa. The FE‐stress results, along with mechanical advantage of adductor musculature, a broad symphyseal contact, and other cranial features suggest that Lystrosaurus may have used a snapping bite to cope with tough fibrous vegetation. Anat Rec, 292:862–874, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.