z-logo
Premium
Preparation and characterization of melt‐stretched polypropylene–polypropylene‐ g ‐poly(α‐methyl styrene‐ co ‐glycidyl methacrylate‐ co ‐γ‐methacryloxypropyl trimethoxy silane)–silicon dioxide compound microporous membranes
Author(s) -
Jiang Shan,
Wang Wei,
Chen Wei,
Zhang Hongwen,
Wang Kemin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.47937
Subject(s) - microporous material , membrane , materials science , polypropylene , polymer chemistry , styrene , glycidyl methacrylate , chemical engineering , methyl methacrylate , composite material , chemistry , polymerization , polymer , copolymer , biochemistry , engineering
Polypropylene (PP)–silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) compound microporous membranes were fabricated by a melt‐stretching method. Although the permeability, porosity, and hydrophilicity values of the microporous membranes were found to be highest at an SiO 2 content of 2 wt %, the heat resistance of the membranes was relatively low. To improve the heat resistance of the microporous membranes, a macromolecular coupling agent, PP‐ g ‐poly(α‐methyl styrene‐ co ‐glycidyl methacrylate‐ co ‐γ‐methacryloxypropyl trimethoxy silane) (PAGK), was introduced into the membrane. In the PP–PP‐ g ‐PAGK–SiO 2 composite systems, the content of SiO 2 was controlled at 2 wt %, and the proportion of PP‐ g ‐PAGK was varied. With increasing PP‐ g ‐PAGK content to 0.6%, the Gurley value decreased from 250 to 239 s, and the porosity increased from 50.8 to 51.6%. The hydrophilicity of the microporous membranes increased with the incorporation of PP‐ g ‐PAGK, and their water vapor transmission rate reached a maximum of 3360 g m −2 /24 h at a PP‐ g ‐PAGK content of 0.6%. The heat resistance of the PP–PP‐ g ‐PAGK–SiO 2 compound microporous membranes was slightly higher than that of the pure PP microporous membrane. Additionally, the cycle performance of a cell assembled with the PP–PP‐ g ‐PAGK–SiO 2 membrane was better than that constructed with the pure PP membrane. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019 , 136 , 47937.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom