Premium
Rapid and efficient sprayed multilayer films for controlled drug delivery
Author(s) -
Hsu Bryan B.,
Hagerman Samantha R.,
Hammond Paula T.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.43563
Subject(s) - materials science , polyelectrolyte , lysozyme , spray drying , coating , nanotechnology , drug delivery , fabrication , polymer , layer by layer , chemical engineering , chromatography , composite material , thin film , chemistry , medicine , biochemistry , alternative medicine , pathology , engineering
The speed and scalability of film fabrication can dictate the translation of technologies from the laboratory scale to industrial level mass production. Spray‐assisted layer‐by‐layer (LbL) film assembly enables the rapid coating of geometrically complex and porous substrates with functional polyelectrolyte multilayers. Unfortunately, the encapsulation efficiency can be as low as one percent, making this technique prohibitively costly with even modestly priced materials. Herein, we used containment chambers to separately capture the aerosolized solutions for each step in the spray‐LbL process and analyzed the effect of recycling on multilayer film assembly. With potential biomedical applications, we studied the controlled release films of (Poly 2/heparin/lysozyme/heparin) n films and tracked the distribution of lysozyme after film assembly. In a “Conventional” Spray‐LbL protocol, only 6% of the aerosolized lysozyme is incorporated into the film. By collecting and returning the expended solutions to their respective reservoirs (Recycle Spray‐LbL), we increased this efficiency to 15%. We also tuned the final distribution of lysozyme by adjusting the spray times (Optimized Spray‐LbL), which minimized the amount of lysozyme lost to non‐specific adsorption and reduced the fraction of lysozyme lost to the wash step from 30% and 75% (Conventional and Recycle Spray‐LbL, respectively) to 13%. Despite the changes in film assembly parameters, each film demonstrated similar controlled release properties. With the inherent limitations of time and cost facing Dip and Conventional Spray‐LbL technologies, respectively, the implementation of recycling to the latter demonstrates improvements in efficiency and time that may make it more attractive for the manufacture of biomedical coatings. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133 , 43563.