Premium
Synthesis and spectroelectrochemical investigation of low‐bandgap polymer: Integrated quinoxaline and benzimidazole in one electron acceptor unit
Author(s) -
Mahmut Mamtimin,
Awut Tunsagul,
Nurulla Ismayil,
Mijit Maxhur
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.40861
Subject(s) - electrochromism , thiophene , quinoxaline , monomer , materials science , hexafluorophosphate , photochemistry , polymerization , imidazole , polymer , polymer chemistry , chemistry , organic chemistry , electrode , ionic liquid , catalysis
Two novel π‐conjugated monomers, 6‐(4‐octyloxyphenyl)‐4,8‐bis(thiophene‐2‐yl)‐3H‐[d] imidazole[1,2,5] benzothiadiazole (M3) and 4‐(4‐octyloxyphenyl)‐2,6‐bis(thiophene‐2‐yl)‐3H‐[d] imidazole‐acenaphtho[1,2‐b]quinoxaline (M4), were synthesized. The monomer M4 contains a thiophene electron‐donating unit and electron withdrawing unit in which quinoxaline and benzimidazole integrated in one benzene ring. Electrochemical polymerization of the monomers was carried out in acetonitrile/dichloromethane solvent mixture containing tetra‐ n ‐butylammonium hexafluorophosphate and electrochromic properties of polymers (P3 and P4) are described in this article. Furthermore, the effects of structural difference on electrochemical redox behavior and spectroelectrochemical properties of the two resulting polymers were examined. The results showed that an anodic wave at +0.48 V versus Ag wire pseudo‐reference electrode corresponding to the monomer M4 oxidation was observed, while one anodic wave at +0.70 V was observed in oxidation of M3 as it contains stronger electron withdrawing thiadiazole structure. The UV‐vis‐Near‐infrared (Near‐infrared spectroscopy) (NIR) spectra analysis revealed that the two polymers have one absorbance band centered at 603 nm. The band gaps, defined as the onset of the absorption band at 603 nm of these polymers, were determined as 1.60 eV for P3 and as 1.55 eV for P4. The electrochromic results showed that P3 revealed about 20% optical contrast at 980 nm and the P4 has 30% optical contrast at 806 nm with low response time (1 s for each polymer). © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131 , 40861.