Premium
Viscoelastic relaxation of styrene–butadiene–styrene block copolymers with different topological structures
Author(s) -
Du Miao,
Yu Qiuming,
Lu Yi,
Zheng Qiang
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.33376
Subject(s) - copolymer , materials science , viscoelasticity , polystyrene , polybutadiene , styrene , styrene butadiene , glass transition , polymer chemistry , rheology , dynamic mechanical analysis , differential scanning calorimetry , relaxation (psychology) , dissipation factor , atmospheric temperature range , composite material , polymer , thermodynamics , dielectric , physics , psychology , social psychology , optoelectronics
The viscoelastic relaxation of linear styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer ( l ‐SBS) and star styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer ( s ‐SBS) with four arms were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic rheological measurements. Three characteristic viscoelastic responses of l ‐SBS and s ‐SBS in the plot of the loss tangent (tan δ) and temperature at different frequencies (ω's), which corresponded to the relaxation of the polybutadiene (PB) block (peak I), the glass transition of the polystyrene (PS) phase (peak II), and the mutual diffusion between the PB blocks and PS blocks (peak III), respectively, were observed in the experimental range. Although ω was 0.1 rad/s, a noticeable peak III was gained for both l ‐SBS and s ‐SBS. The dynamic storage modulus ( G ′) of l ‐SBS showed two distinct types of behavior, depending on the temperature. At temperature ( T ) < T 2 (where T 2 is the temperature corresponding to peak II), G ′ of l ‐SBS displayed a very weak ω dependency. In contrast, at T > T 2 , G ′ decayed much more rapidly. However, G ′ of s ‐SBS displayed a very weak ω dependency at both T < T 2 and T > T 2 . Only near T 2 did s ‐SBS decay with ω a little sharply. These indicated, in contrast to l ‐SBS, that s ‐SBS still exhibited more elasticity even at T > T 2 because of its crosslinking point between the PB blocks (the star structure). In the lower ω range, l ‐SBS exhibited a stronger peak III than s ‐SBS despite the same styrene content for l ‐SBS and s ‐SBS. The high tan δ value of peak III for l ‐SBS was considered to be related to the internal friction among the PB blocks or the whole l ‐SBS chain, not the PS blocks. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011