Premium
Physical properties of polyamide 6/metallocene isotactic polypropylene conjugated filaments
Author(s) -
Hsiao KaiJen,
Jue ZhiFeng,
Kong DanCheng,
Chen Frank L
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.24214
Subject(s) - differential scanning calorimetry , materials science , tacticity , polymer chemistry , polymer , thermogravimetric analysis , polymer blend , polyamide , rheometry , scanning electron microscope , composite material , polymerization , chemical engineering , copolymer , physics , engineering , thermodynamics
Polyamide 6 (PA 6) and metallocene isotactic polypropylene (m‐iPP) polymers were extruded (in proportions of 75/25, 50/50, and 25/75) from two melt twin‐screw extruders to prepare three PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments. This study investigated the physical properties of PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments with gel permeation chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, potentiometry, rheometry, density‐gradient measurements, wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction, extension stress–strain measurements, and scanning electron microscopy. The flow behavior of PA 6/m‐iPP polyblended polymers exhibited negative‐deviation blends, and a 50/50 PA 6/m‐iPP blend showed the minimum value of the melt viscosity. The experimental results from differential scanning calorimetry indicated that PA 6 and m‐iPP molecules formed an immiscible system. The tenacity of the PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments decreased initially and then increased as the m‐iPP content increased. The crystallinities and densities of the PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filaments had a linear relationship with the blend ratio. Morphological observations revealed that the blends had a dispersed‐phase structure. A pore/fiber morphology of a larger size (from 0.5 to 3 μm in diameter) was observed after a formic acid (PA 6 was moved)/xylene (m‐iPP was moved) treatment on the cross section of a PA 6/m‐iPP conjugated filament. PA 6 and m‐iPP polymers were proved to be an incompatible system. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 1471–1476, 2006