Premium
Morphology and mechanical properties of blends of thermoplastic polyurethane and polyolefins
Author(s) -
Di Yali,
Kang Maoqing,
Zhao Yuhua,
Yan Shirun,
Wang Xinkui
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/app.22809
Subject(s) - materials science , thermoplastic polyurethane , compatibilization , composite material , ultimate tensile strength , particle size , izod impact strength test , viscosity , maleic anhydride , polyurethane , polymer blend , dynamic mechanical analysis , scanning electron microscope , thermoplastic , phase (matter) , apparent viscosity , chemical engineering , polymer , copolymer , elastomer , chemistry , organic chemistry , engineering
Abstract Polyolefins (PO) were melt mixed with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) in a 20 : 80 weight ratio with or without compatibilizer containing 0.5 wt % of maleic anhydride. Effects of component viscosities on morphology and on mechanical properties of the blend were studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM), tensile property analysis, and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). It was found that the disperse particle size of compatibilizer‐free blends decreased with the decreasing viscosity ratio of the disperse phase to TPU. The efficiency of the compatibilizer in reducing the particle size varied with viscosity ratios of the disperse phase to compatibilizer. However, the particle size did not decrease with the decreasing viscosity ratio monotonically. With lower viscosity ratio, addition of 5 wt % compatibilizer resulted in a greater reduction of particle size and less loss in the tensile properties as compared to the TPU matrix. For the polyethene (PE) that has the lowest viscosity value among all the POs, its size in the blend was stabilized with the addition of compatibilizer and no compatibilization was detected by DMA and by tensile property analysis. The mobility of the disperse phase and compatibilizer and the dispersion competition between them seemed important. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 875–883, 2006